People call it resilience because it makes them feel better.
You were so strong.
I don’t know how you did it.
You’re resilient.
Those words land like praise, but they function like a lid. They close the conversation just as it should open.
What you call strength was not strength.
It was necessity.
Resilience implies choice.
It implies capacity.
It implies something internal that rose to meet the challenge.
That is not what happened.
What happened was that stopping was not an option.
I did not endure because I was strong.
I endured because if I didn’t, everything would collapse — and I knew there would be no one there to catch it.
There was no feeling of strength.
There was no sense of triumph.
There was fear. Constant, background fear. The kind that hums under the skin and never switches off.
I was not coping.
I was holding on.
Calling this resilience suggests something admirable, something aspirational. It turns a safeguarding failure into a personality trait. It allows people to admire the outcome while ignoring the conditions that made it necessary.
It shifts the focus away from the fact that I should not have been left alone like that.
Resilience language is convenient. It reassures the listener that the system worked because the person survived. It turns survival into evidence that no intervention was needed.
But survival is a low bar.
I was not growing.
I was not adapting in a healthy way.
I was narrowing my life to avoid catastrophe.
That is not resilience.
That is containment under threat.
When you tell someone like me that they were strong, what you are really saying is: I’m glad you managed, because it means no one else had to step in.
That is not a compliment.
It asks me to be proud of what damaged me. It asks me to wear terror like a medal. It asks me to agree that this was acceptable.
It wasn’t.
I wasn’t strong.
I was scared.
I was exhausted.
I was operating far beyond what was safe.
I survived because I had no alternative — not because I had reserves.
Call it what it was.
It was survival without support.
It was being left to manage risk alone.
It was hanging on by a thread and calling it functioning.
And the truth is this:
If resilience is required, something has already gone wrong.
If someone has to be that strong, they have already been failed.
Don’t praise the endurance.
Ask why it was necessary.
—Frost ❄️


Leave a Reply